|
Follow-up to the drunk driver who smashed our car. In total, 5 vehicles were involved:
We still don't know if the guy had insurance, but officer's told us on the scene that he had a previous DWI conviction. The penalty for 2nd offense is 30 days to 1 year in jail. I found the police report online today, it shows the driver's name (Paul Keenan) and that he's 19 years old. So he's got a 2nd DWI on his record, while being underage, possibly without insurance, and he just destroyed 3 cars + wreck a young woman's face. Nice going, dumb ass. |
First time offense is one thing, but this guy has already been busted for drunk driving, so now he's just an irresponsible jerk. He was driving a Ford Explorer, none of the airbags deployed, and the front passenger smashed her face into the dashboard in the collision. Her jaw is broken, she lost a bunch of teeth, and bled all over the place (her friend came to our house today, gave us an update). Last we heard, she had gone to the emergency room for surgery. I guess they'll try to put her face back together. Why do we allow drivers like him back on the road? Now that he's had a second DUI (the cops showed up and took him to jail), how long until he's behind the wheel again? How long until he smashes up another 3 or 4 cars? What if he gets in another wreck, but instead of killing himself in the process, what if he takes someone else's life instead of his own? Here are some photos from last night, taken within an hour or so of the accident. |
So I was looking for info about the "Hammond Pro α" by Nittaku. I found their website, and it includes this super-informative graphic (which explains, um, something... in Japanese...), and this awesome product info. This sure helped me make up my mind! No more questions from me! I can't stand the "durability to become bad", and want to ensure that "seat and sponge invent big repulsive force". "Rubber and medicine are combined at the time of rubber generation"... what?! Rubber and medicine?? This shit sounds like magic! A rubber seat was 20-30% in the past rebellion became so good that the ratio of the rubber substitute to natural rubber became high but for the durability to become bad. A seat of a HAMMONDseries is to set rubber substitute to about 2 times of 60% while maintaining the durability, and high repulsive force is being shown. Highly precise rubber generation will be possible by nanocomposite technology, and Hammond-Xis also combining rubber substitute 70% in a sponge. (In the past, for rubber substitute 0, HAMMONDand professional ?, 50%) these seat and sponge invent big repulsive force. (More energy losses will be small.) if the batted ball process is expressed, flexibility of the natural rubber (catches a ball tightly and makes) them rip, and the ball repulsive force of rubber substitute caught is driven to the batted ball direction, said, it'll be (figure 1 referring). |
|
I just read "Why affordable housing at Mueller will fail" and it makes a lot of sense. Affordable housing is supposed to provide opportunity for lower-income home buyers, that part's fine. But once a home has been sold to lower-income family (basically at a discount, funded by the city government), there is nothing that prevents that family from turning around and selling their home at current market prices. In the above post, he argues that within 5 years, that's pretty much what will happen. For example, say home #1 normally sells for $150,000, but the affordable housing version (home #2) sells or $120,000. That's great, if you qualify, you can buy home #2 and basically save $30,000. But if you were to turn around and sell home #2 a few years later, you could easily sell it for much more than your purchase price. In fact, if home #1 goes on the market for $160,000 (up $10k from original price), why wouldn't you sell your home #2 for $160,000 as well? You would. And by doing so, you've basically converted the city government's charity from a housing discount into real money. So what's wrong with that? Nothing, except that it won't take long before "affordable housing" home owners figure this out, sell their home for huge gains, and then... you're left with a housing development that looks a lot like what you would have if you had started out selling everything at current market prices (i.e., without any "affordable housing" homes at all). Whatever your initial goals were (diversifying the home owners, creating opportunity for lower-income families, etc.), you'll end up with something different. It would probably just be easier all around if the city held a random drawing among lower-income families and handed out $25,000 sacks of money. |
|
Jan Ullrich: World Champion, Olympic Gold Medal winner, Tour de France winner, and... Cheater. German sports news agency sid announced that blood bags from Operación Puerto have been proven as those of Jan Ullrich through DNA comparison. Public prosecutor Fred Apostel said the comparison shows "without a doubt" that the blood is Ullrich's. Ullrich's team has fired back that the results have been manipulated, he didn't cheat, etc. Several things stand out as important:
Of course, there's always the possibility that foul play was involved as Ullrich claims, and he's innocent, etc., but I just don't see it. Here's the full text from cyclingnews: German sports news agency sid revealed on Tuesday afternoon that the blood bags seized in Operación Puerto and marked "Jan," "number 1" or "Hijo Rudicio" ('son of Rudy') have been confirmed to contain the blood of the now-retired German cycling star, Jan Ullrich. Public prosecutor Fred Apostel told sports news agency sid that the comparison with a DNA sample taken from Ullrich's saliva showed "without a doubt" that the blood seized by the Guardia Civil last year indeed belonged to the only German to have ever won the Tour de France. |
|
I just found Shirt-a-Day (www.shirtaday.com) - they sell a different t-shirt every day, and the price goes down in real-time as more people buy it. At the end of the day, the final price is what all customers are actually billed. Interesting pricing model. |


